Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kleinstein, S. H.
Right arrow Articles by Singh, J. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kleinstein, S. H.
Right arrow Articles by Singh, J. P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

International Immunology, Vol. 15, No. 7, pp. 871-884, July 2003
© 2003 Japanese Society for Immunology

Why are there so few key mutant clones? The influence of stochastic selection and blocking on affinity maturation in the germinal center

Steven H. Kleinstein1 and Jaswinder Pal Singh1

1 Department of Computer Science, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA

Correspondence to: S. Kleinstein, Physiome Sciences, 150 College Road West, Princeton, NJ 08540, USA. E-mail: stevenk{at}cs.princeton.edu
Transmitting editor: M. C. Nussenzweig

A small number of key somatic mutations lead to high-affinity binding in the anti-hapten immune responses to 2-phenyl-5-oxazolone (phOx) and (4-hydroxy-3-nitrophenyl)acetyl (NP). Affinity maturation models of the germinal center hold that B cells carrying these key mutations are preferentially selected for expansion within the germinal centers. However, additional factors are required to account for some quantitative aspects of affinity maturation in vivo. Radmacher et al. have shown that key mutants are observed in vivo significantly less frequently than expected by these models. To account for this finding, they propose that selection is a stochastic process where key mutants may be overlooked by positive selection or recruited out of the germinal center. While acknowledging that a minimal amount of stochastic selection is probably unavoidable in the germinal center, we instead propose a structural explanation for this key mutant discrepancy. This model is based on the existence of a large number of blocking mutations whose presence can prevent the ability of key mutations to confer high-affinity binding. Using mathematical modeling and computer simulation, we show that in addition to reconciling the key mutant discrepancy, the blocking model accounts for other aspects of experimental data that are not predicted by the stochastic selection model. In particular, the blocking model is consistent with the observation that key mutants generally exhibit a higher number of mutations per sequence in the phOx response, but a lower number in the NP response.

Keywords: 2-phenyl-5-oxazolone, (4-hydroxy-3-nitrophenyl)acetyl, mathematical modeling, somatic hypermutation


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Int ImmunolHome page
U. Hershberg, M. Uduman, M. J. Shlomchik, and S. H. Kleinstein
Improved methods for detecting selection by mutation analysis of Ig V region sequences
Int. Immunol., May 1, 2008; 20(5): 683 - 694.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.