International Immunology, Vol. 11, No. 5, 677-688,
May 1999
© 1999 Japanese Society for Immunology
Specific regulation of Fos family transcription factors in thymocytes at two developmental checkpoints
Division of Biology 156-29, California Institute of Technology, 1200 East California Boulevard,Pasadena, CA 91125, USA
Correspondence to: E. V. Rothenberg
A central question in T cell development is what makes cortical thymocytes respond to stimulation in a qualitatively different way than any other thymocyte subset. Part of the answer is that AP-1 function changes drastically at two stages of T cell development. It undergoes striking down-regulation as thymocytes differentiate from immature, CD4–CD8– double-negative (DN) TCR– thymocytes to CD4+CD8+ double-positive (DP) TCRlo cortical cells, and then returns in the cells that mature to TCRhigh, CD4+CD8– or CD4–CD8+ single-positive (SP) thymocytes. At all three stages, the jun family mRNAs can be induced similarly. However, we demonstrate that DP cortical thymocytes are specifically impaired in c-fos and fosB mRNA induction, even when stimuli are used that optimize survival of the cells and a form of in vitro maturation. fra-2 expression is induction independent but much lower in DP cells than in the other subsets. Overall Fos family protein induction accordingly is severely decreased in DP cells. Defective c-Fos and FosB expression in cortical thymocytes is functionally significant, because antibody supershift experiments show that in activated immature and mature thymocytes, most detectable AP-1 DNA-binding complexes do contain c-Fos or FosB. Thus, defective c-Fos and FosB expression in cortical thymocytes qualitatively alters any AP-1 complexes they might express. The cortical thymocytes are not deficient in mRNA expression for any of the constitutive transcription factors that are known to be needed to drive c-Fos or FosB expression, so it is possible that the activity of these factors is developmentally regulated through a post-transcriptional mechanism.
Keywords: AP-1, ß-selection, positive selection, T cell development
1 Present address: SyStemix, Inc., 3155 Porter Drive, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA
Transmitting editor: A. Singer
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  R. J. Lund, M. Loytomaki, T. Naumanen, C. Dixon, Z. Chen, H. Ahlfors, S. Tuomela, J. Tahvanainen, J. Scheinin, T. Henttinen, et al. Genome-Wide Identification of Novel Genes Involved in Early Th1 and Th2 Cell Differentiation J. Immunol., March 15, 2007; 178(6): 3648 - 3660. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Y. H. Huang, D. Li, A. Winoto, and E. A. Robey Distinct transcriptional programs in thymocytes responding to T cell receptor, Notch, and positive selection signals PNAS, April 6, 2004; 101(14): 4936 - 4941. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. L. Williams, A. J. Zullo, M. H. Kaplan, R. R. Brutkiewicz, C. D. Deppmann, C. Vinson, and E. J. Taparowsky BATF Transgenic Mice Reveal a Role for Activator Protein-1 in NKT Cell Development J. Immunol., March 1, 2003; 170(5): 2417 - 2426. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Nunomura, T. Sato, and S. Habu Molecular Basis for Functional Maturation of Thymocytes: Increase in c-fos Translation with Positive Selection J. Immunol., June 1, 2000; 164(11): 5590 - 5595. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Adachi, Y. Amasaki, S. Miyatake, N. Arai, and M. Iwata Successive Expression and Activation of NFAT Family Members during Thymocyte Differentiation J. Biol. Chem., May 5, 2000; 275(19): 14708 - 14716. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. K. Teague, D. Hildeman, R. M. Kedl, T. Mitchell, W. Rees, B. C. Schaefer, J. Bender, J. Kappler, and P. Marrack Activation changes the spectrum but not the diversity of genes expressed by T cells PNAS, October 26, 1999; 96(22): 12691 - 12696. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|