Skip Navigation


International Immunology Advance Access originally published online on April 12, 2006
International Immunology 2006 18(6):847-855; doi:10.1093/intimm/dxl021
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
18/6/847    most recent
dxl021v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ishikawa, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Nakanishi, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ishikawa, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Nakanishi, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© The Japanese Society for Immunology. 2006. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Contribution of IL-18-induced innate T cell activation to airway inflammation with mucus hypersecretion and airway hyperresponsiveness

Yuriko Ishikawa1,2,, Tomohiro Yoshimoto1,2, and Kenji Nakanishi1,2,

1 Department of Immunology and Medical Zoology, Hyogo College of Medicine, Nishinomiya, Hyogo 663-8501, Japan
2 Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology, Japan Science and Technology Corporation, Saitama 332-0012, Japan

Correspondence to: K. Nakanishi; E-mail: nakaken{at}hyo-med.ac.jp


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Human bronchial asthma is characterized by airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR), eosinophilic airway inflammation, mucus hypersecretion and high serum level of IgE. IL-18 was originally regarded to induce Th1-related cytokines from Th1 cells in the presence of IL-12. However, our previous reports clearly demonstrated that IL-18 with IL-2 promotes Th2 cytokines production from T cells and NK cells. Furthermore, IL-18 with IL-3 stimulates basophils and mast cells to produce Th2 cytokines. Thus, we examined the capacity of IL-2 and IL-18 to induce AHR, airway eosinophilic inflammation and goblet cell metaplasia. Intranasal administration of IL-2 and IL-18 induces AHR, mucus hypersecretion and eosinophilic inflammation in the lungs of naive mice. CD4+ T cells are prerequisite for this IL-2 plus IL-18-induced bronchial asthma, because CD4+ T cells-depleted or Rag-2-deficient (Rag-2–/–) mice did not develop bronchial asthma after IL-2 plus IL-18 treatment. Both STAT6–/– mice and IL-13-neutralized wild-type mice failed to develop AHR, goblet cell metaplasia and airway eosinophilic inflammation, while IL-4–/– mice almost normally developed, suggesting that IL-13 is a major causative factor and IL-4 mainly enhances the degree of AHR and eosinophilic inflammation. Both IL-4 and IL-13 equally induce eotaxin in mouse embryonic fibroblasts. However, only IL-13 blockade inhibited asthma symptoms, suggesting that IL-13 but not IL-4 is produced abundantly and plays a critical role in the pathogenesis of bronchial asthma in this model. As airway epithelial cells store robust IL-18, IL-18 might be critically involved in pathogen-induced bronchial asthma, in which pathogens stimulate epithelial cells to produce IL-18 without IL-12 induction.

Keywords: bronchial asthma, IL-4, IL-13, innate type 2, mucin


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Bronchial asthma is characterized by airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR), eosinophilic airway inflammation, airway remodeling, airway mucus hypersecretion and high serum levels of IgE (1–4). AHR and mucus oversecretion are often linked to asthma symptoms and morbidity. Although the mechanisms underlying these features are complex, it is widely accepted that Th2 cells, which produce a limited repertoire of cytokines including IL-4, IL-5, IL-9 and IL-13, are responsible for inducing these characteristic features of bronchial asthma (5–7). Indeed, CD4+ T cells producing IL-4, IL-5, IL-9 and IL-13 were identified in the bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) and airway biopsy (8,9) of asthma patients. Experimental animal studies also revealed that Th2 cells induce airway eosinophilia, goblet cell metaplasia with mucus oversecretion and AHR (10). Among the Th2-related cytokines, IL-13 is suggested to play a critical role in induction of AHR and mucus oversecretion (11–14). Indeed, blockade of IL-13 markedly inhibits allergen-induced AHR, eosinophilic inflammation and goblet cell metaplasia in animal models (11,12). Furthermore, direct intranasal administration of IL-13 into naive mice induces mucus hypersecretion, airway eosinophilic infiltration and AHR (11,12).

In contrast, Th1 cells had generally been regarded to protect against bronchial asthma by damping the activity of Th2 cells via IFN-{gamma} (15,16). However, our recent studies revealed that naive mice transferred with antigen-specific Th1 cells exhibit bronchial asthma after challenge with both antigen and IL-18 but not with antigen alone (17). We found that Th1 cells become very pathological, when they are stimulated with Ag and IL-18, possibly by production of IL-13 and IFN-{gamma}. Our study substantiated further the previous study that administration of a combination of IL-13 and IFN-{gamma} induces severe airway inflammation independently of antigenic challenge (18).

IL-18 was originally identified as a factor that enhances IFN-{gamma} production from Th1 cells in the presence of anti-CD3 and IL-12 (19–21). However, our recent studies and those of others demonstrated that IL-18 directly promotes Th2 cytokines production from T cells, NK cells, basophils and mast cells, resulting in IgE production (22–27). Usually, secretion of cytokines by T cells is the result of antigen-stimulation. Therefore, cytokines can play a critical role in regulation of an acquired immune response. However, T cells stimulated with IL-12 plus IL-18 exhibit Th1 response (28). Furthermore, T cells also show Th2 response when stimulated with IL-2 and IL-18 in the absence of Ag stimulation (25,26). Since IL-18 induces Th1 or Th2 cytokines production by T cells without TCR engagement, we could designate these TCR-independent T cell activation pathways as innate type 1 or type 2 T cell activation, respectively (28–30). As airway epithelial cells store robust IL-18 (31), we could assume the possibility that some types of infectious agents might stimulate bronchial epithelial cells to produce IL-18. Thus, it is very important to determine the biological relevance of IL-18-induced innate T cell activation pathway in the pathogenesis of bronchial asthma.

Here, we have demonstrated that intranasal administration of IL-2 and IL-18 into naive mice induces them to express various mRNAs for cytokines (IL-4, -5, -9, -13, -17) and chemokines (MIP-2, GCP-2 and eotaxin) in their lungs and to develop dense infiltration of eosinophils and neutrophils in the peribronchial and perivenular region, goblet cell metaplasia with mucus hypersecretion and AHR, which are prominent features of bronchial asthma. These data suggest the biological relevance of IL-18 in antigen-independent bronchial asthma following viral or bacterial airway infection.


    Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Animals and reagents
Specific pathogen-free (SPF) female BALB/c mice and BALB/c-background STAT6-deficient (STAT6–/–) mice were purchased from Jackson Laboratory. BALB/c IL-4–/– and Rag-2–/– mice were obtained from Taconic (Germantown, NY, USA). All mice were bred under SPF condition at the animal facilities of Hyogo College of Medicine (Nishinomiya, Japan) and were used at 8–10 weeks of age. Animal experiments were conducted according to the Guideline for Animal Experiments at Hyogo College of Medicine. Recombinant human IL-2 was kindly provided by Ajinomoto Co. Inc. (Kawasaki, Japan). Recombinant mouse IL-5, IL-13 and IL-18 were purchased from Genetics Institute Inc. (Cambridge, MA, USA) and MBL (Nagoya, Japan), respectively. Recombinant mouse IL-4 was obtained and purified from a recombinant baculovirus (AcMNPV.IL-4) prepared in our laboratory.

In vivo treatment of mice
Animals were daily exposed intranasally to various combinations of IL-18 (0–1 µg day–1) and IL-2 (500 U day–1) in 50 µl of PBS for 1–4 days. Control mice were exposed to PBS alone. Mice were analyzed at 24 h after the final exposure to PBS alone or cytokines. To deplete CD4+ T cells, BALB/c mice were intraperitoneally injected four times (–14, –10, –7, –4 days before cytokine treatment) with mAb to CD4 (clone, GK1.5; 0.5 mg day–1). For the blockade of IL-13 in vivo, 20 µg of sIL-13R{alpha}2-Fc or 20 µg of control human IgG (Genetics Institute Inc.) were daily administered intranasally as the mixed form with IL-2 and IL-18 for 4 days.

Measurement of AHR
We measured AHR to ß-methacholine (Mch) inhalation in mice by using Pulmos-I (MIPS, Osaka, Japan) hardware and software as described in our previous report (17). We placed a mouse in a chamber and exposed it to aerosols of saline (baseline) first and then to increased concentrations of Mch (5, 10 and 20 mg ml–1). After each 2 min exposure, we measured enhanced pause, a dimensionless index that reflects changes in amplitude of pressure waveform and expiratory time, for 3 min.

BAL
BAL was performed with three aliquots of 1.0 ml of PBS per mouse. Total cell counts were performed. Cytospin preparations of BAL fluid (BALF) were stained with Diff-Quik (Baxter Healthcare Corp., Miami, FL, USA), and differentials were performed based on morphology and staining characteristics.

Histology
Lungs were prepared for histology by perfusion of the animal via the right ventricle with 10 ml of PBS, then fixed in 10% buffered formalin, cut into 3-µm sections and stained with hematoxylin and eosin or predigested periodic acid Schiff.

Preparation of embryonic fibroblasts
Mouse embryonic fibroblasts were prepared from E14 embryos generated by BALB/c mice. Briefly, the heads were removed, and the carcasses were finely minced with scissors and digested by incubation in PBS containing 0.1% trypsin (GIBCO-BRL, Grand Island, NY, USA) and 0.02% EDTA (NACALAI TESQUE, INC., Kyoto, Japan) for 20 min at 37°C. Trypsin was inactivated by washing the cells twice using DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS, 2-ME (50 µM), L-glutamine (2 mM), penicillin (100 U ml)–1 and streptomycin (100 µg ml–1) and the cells were plated onto tissue culture dishes. After 3–4 days, when the growth of fibroblasts was established, embryo fragments were removed. Embryonic fibroblasts were maintained as a monolayer culture, and cells from the second or third passage were used.

In vitro culture
Splenic CD4+ T cells from BALB/c mice were purified by MicroBeads (anti-mouse CD4, clone RM4-5; Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany). The enriched CD4+ T cells (105/0.2 ml well–1) were cultured with medium alone or various combinations of IL-2 (200 pM) and IL-18 (50 ng ml–1) for 4 days in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% FBS, 2-ME (50 µM), L-glutamine (2 mM), penicillin (100 U ml–1) and streptomycin (100 µg ml–1). Supernatants were harvested and tested for IL-4 and IL-13 contents by ELISA. Mouse embryonic fibroblasts (5 x 104/0.2 ml well–1) were cultured with complete DMEM alone, various combinations of IL-4 (103 U ml–1) and IL-13 (10 ng ml–1) or IL-5 (10 ng ml–1) for 2 days. Supernatants were harvested and tested for eotaxin contents by ELISA.

Homogenized lungs
BALB/c mice were daily exposed intranasally to IL-18 (1 µg day–1) and IL-2 (500 U day–1) for 1–4 days. Lungs were removed at 8 h after the final exposure to IL-2 and IL-18 and homogenized with 1 ml of 0.1% TritonX100 containing 2 mM EDTA, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF), 2 µg ml–1 aprotinin and 2 µg ml–1 leupeptin by Bead Smash 12 (WAKENYAKU, Kyoto, Japan) for 1 min, and centrifuged at 9100 x g for 5 min at 4°C. The obtained supernatants were tested for IL-4 and IL-13 contents by ELISA.

Reverse Transcription–PCR analysis
Animals were daily exposed intranasally to IL-18 (1 µg day–1) and IL-2 (500 U day–1) in 50 µl of PBS for 1–4 days. Lungs were removed at 4 h after the final exposure to IL-2 and IL-18 and total RNA was extracted using Trizol reagent, treated with DNase I and reverse transcribed using Superscript II RT and oligo (dT)12–18 primer (all four reagents from Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). For amplification of IL-4 and IL-13 cDNA, after initial denaturation step at 94°C for 2 min, 34 cycles were performed at 94°C for 1 min followed by 55°C for 1 min and 68°C for 1 min, and then further extension at 68°C for 7 min. For amplification of IL-9 cDNA, PCR assays were performed for 34 cycles (94°C for 1 min followed by 58°C for 1 min and 68°C for 1 min). For amplification of IL-5, MIP-2, eotaxin-2, RANTES and GCP-2 cDNA, PCR assays were performed for 34 cycles (94°C for 1 min followed by 60°C for 1 min and 68°C for 1 min). For amplification of eotaxin and ß-actin cDNA, PCR assays were performed for 30 cycles (94°C for 1 min followed by 62°C for 1 min and 68°C for 1 min). For amplification of IL-17 cDNA, PCR assays were performed for 34 cycles (94°C for 15 s followed by 58°C for 30 s and 68°C for 1 min). At the end of cycles, samples were stored at 4°C until analyzed. After amplification, PCR products were separated by electrophoresis in 1.7% agarose gels and visualized by UV light illumination. Primer sequences were as follows: IL-4, 5'-GAA TGT ACC AGG AGC CAT ATC, 3'-CTC AGT ACT ACG AGT AAT CCA; IL-5, 5'-ATG GAG ATT CCC ATG AGC AC, 3'-GTC TCT CCT CGC CAC ACT TC; IL-9, 5'-TAC ATC CTT GCC TCT GTT TT, 3'-CAG AAA TGA CAG TGT GTT GC; IL-13, 5'-ACA GCT CCC TGG TTC TCT CA, 3'-GCT ACT TCG ATT TTG GTA TCG G; IL-17, 5'-TCT CAT CCA GCA AGA GAT CC, 3'-AGT TTG GGA CCC CTT TAC AC; eotaxin, 5'-CTC CAC AGC GCT TCT ATT CC, 3'-CTT CTT CTT GGG GTC AGC AC; GCP-2, 5'-CCA CCC ACG GAT TTT CTT TA, 3'-GGT CCC CAT TTC ATG AGA GA; eotaxin-2, 5'-CTG TGA CCA TCC CCT CAT CT, 3'-TAT GTG CCT CTG AAC CCA CA; RANTES, 5'-GTG CCC ACG TCA AGG AGT AT, 3'-ATT TCT TGG GTT TGC TGT GC; MIP-2, 5'-GAA GTC ATA GCC ACT CTC AAG GGG C, 3'-CAA CTC ACC CTC TCC CCA GAA AC; ß-actin, 5'-GTA CGA CCA GAG GCA TAC AGG, 3'-GAT GAC GAT ATC GCT GCG CTG.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
IL-2 plus IL-18-induced mucus hypersecretion, airway inflammation and AHR
We first examined the effect of IL-2 and IL-18 treatment on airway inflammation and AHR. We daily treated naive BALB/c mice with intranasal administration of IL-2 and/or IL-18 for 4 days. Histopathological analysis of the lung revealed that administration of IL-18 (1 µg day–1) and IL-2 (500 U day–1) strongly induced peribronchial and perivenular infiltration with eosinophils and mononuclear cells, and goblet cell metaplasia with mucus hypersecretion in the airways (Fig. 1A and B). However, treatment with each component alone did not induce or only weakly induced these changes (Fig. 1A). Titration study indicated that IL-18, in the presence of IL-2 (500 U day–1), dose-dependently induced airway inflammation and mucus production (Fig. 1A). Kinetic study revealed that 1 day or 2 days treatment with IL-18 (1 µg day–1) and IL-2 (500 U day–1) was not sufficient to induce airway inflammation and goblet cell metaplasia. However, 3 or 4 days treatment induced overt airway inflammation and goblet cell metaplasia (data not shown). Furthermore, mice received IL-2 and IL-18 >3 days through their nasal tracts exhibited AHR after nasal exposure to various concentrations of Mch, whereas mice received PBS, IL-2 or IL-18 alone did not exhibit (Fig. 1C), suggesting that intranasal administration of IL-2 and IL-18 induces naive mice to develop mucus hypersecretion, airway inflammation and AHR.


Figure 1
View larger version (57K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1 IL-2 plus IL-18-induced goblet cell hyperplasia, AHR and airway inflammation in naive mice. (A and B) BALB/c mice (6–8 mice per group) were daily exposed intranasally to PBS alone, or IL-18 (0.5–1 µg day–1) and/or IL-2 (500 U day–1) in 50 µl of PBS for 4 days. Lungs were prepared for histology by perfusing the animal via the right ventricle with 10 ml of PBS, then fixed in 10% buffered formalin, cut into 3-µm sections and stained with predigested periodic acid Schiff (A) or hematoxylin and eosin (B). Original magnification: x100. (C) AHR in response to increased concentrations of inhaled ß-methacholine was measured in a whole-body plethysmograph. (D) Inflammatory cell composition of BALF from mice daily exposed intranasally to PBS alone, or IL-18 (1 µg day–1) and/or IL-2 (500 U day–1) for 4 consecutive days. Cell differential percentages were determined by light microscopic evaluation of cytospin preparation. Data are expressed as absolute numbers of cells. Representative results of five animals were shown.

 
To understand the mechanisms underlying IL-2 and IL-18-induced AHR, we examined the numbers of inflammatory cells infiltrating lung tissues of mice after their exposure to PBS, IL-2 and/or IL-18 for 4 days (Fig. 1D). Analysis of BALF revealed marked increases in the numbers of eosinophils and neutrophils after administration of both IL-2 and IL-18 (Fig. 1D), suggesting that IL-2 and IL-18 induce infiltration of eosinophils and neutrophils in the lungs. These results taken together strongly indicated that intranasal administration of IL-2 and IL-18 induced mucus hypersecretion, airway infiltration with eosinophils and neutrophils and AHR, which are prominent pathological and physiological features of bronchial asthma.

CD4+ T cell-dependent bronchial asthma in IL-2 plus IL-18-treated mice
To determine whether this IL-2 plus IL-18-induced bronchial asthma is dependent on the function of CD4+ T cells, we administrated IL-2 and IL-18 into BALB/c wild-type mice depleted of CD4+ T cells by the pretreatment with anti-CD4 antibody or Rag-2–/– mice, lacking both T cells and B cells. Anti-CD4 treatment significantly impaired IL-2 plus IL-18-induced goblet cell metaplasia with mucus production (Fig. 2A), AHR upon Mch challenge (Fig. 2B) and the number of eosinophils and neutrophils in BALF (Fig. 2C). IL-2 plus IL-18-administered Rag-2–/– mice showed no mucus production, AHR and airway inflammation (Fig. 2). These results clearly indicated that IL-2 plus IL-18-induced bronchial asthma by activation of CD4+ T cells.


Figure 2
View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2 IL-2 plus IL-18-induced CD4+ T cell-dependent goblet cell hyperplasia, AHR and airway inflammation. BALB/c wild-type (WT) and BALB/c-background Rag-2–/– (RAG–/–) mice were daily exposed intranasally to IL-18 (1 µg day–1) and IL-2 (500 U day–1) for 4 days. To deplete CD4+ T cells, BALB/c mice received anti-CD4 (GK1.5; 0.5 mg day–1) antibody at 4, 7, 10 and 14 days before intranasal administration of IL-2 and IL-18. Twenty-four hours after the final exposure to IL-2 plus IL-18, lungs were stained with predigested periodic acid Schiff (A), AHR in response to increasing concentrations of inhaled ß-methacholine (B), and inflammatory cell composition of BALF (C) were examined as described in Fig. 1. Representative results of six animals were shown.

 
IL-13 induces mucus hypersecretion, airway inflammation and AHR
To determine which cytokines mediate IL-2 plus IL-18-induced goblet cell metaplasia with mucus hypersecretion, airway infiltration with eosinophils and neutophils and AHR, we intranasally administered IL-2 and IL-18 into STAT6–/– mice, IL-4–/– mice or BALB/c wild-type mice given a soluble IL-13R{alpha}2-human Fc fusion protein (sIL-13R{alpha}2-Fc), which selectively binds to and neutralizes IL-13 (17,26). As shown in Fig. 3, STAT6–/– mice completely evaded IL-2 and IL-18-induced bronchial asthma, suggesting the critical involvement of IL-4 and/or IL-13 in bronchial asthma. However, IL-4–/– mice normally developed goblet cell metaplasia (Fig. 3A), whereas wild-type mice treated with sIL-13R{alpha}2-Fc failed to do so (Fig. 3A), suggesting that IL-13 is indispensable for inducing mucus overproduction. IL-4–/– mice diminished but still exhibited AHR and airway eosinophilic inflammation (Fig. 3B and C), whereas wild-type mice treated with sIL-13R{alpha}2-Fc did not exhibit AHR and airway eosinophilic infiltration (Fig. 3B and C), suggesting the importance of IL-13 in the pathogenesis of bronchial asthma. In Fig. 3(D), we demonstrated that splenic CD4+ T cells become highly IL-13-producing cells when they are stimulated with IL-2 and IL-18 in vitro. Compared with IL-13 production (29.8 ± 6.8 ng ml–1), IL-2 plus IL-18-stimulated T cells produced IL-4 poorly (94.5 ± 7.5 pg ml–1). Furthermore, compared with the degree of IL-4 induction, IL-2 and IL-18 more strongly induced IL-13 in the lungs (Fig. 3E). These results suggest the possibility that IL-2 plus IL-18 induces goblet cell metaplasia, AHR and eosinophilic infiltration principally by strong IL-13 induction and only partly by IL-4 due to poor IL-4 induction.


Figure 3
View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3 IL-2 plus IL-18-induced STAT6-dependent goblet cell hyperplasia, AHR and airway inflammation. BALB/c wild-type (WT), BALB/c-background STAT6–/– and IL-4–/– mice were daily exposed intranasally to IL-18 (1 µg day–1) and IL-2 (500 U day–1) for 4 days. For the blockade of IL-13 in vivo, 20 µg of sIL-13R{alpha}2-Fc or 20 µg of control human IgG were daily administered intranasally as the mixed form with IL-2 and IL-18 for 4 days. Twenty-four hours after the final exposure to IL-2 plus IL-18, lungs were stained with predigested periodic acid Schiff (A), AHR in response to increasing concentrations of inhaled ß-methacholine (B), and inflammatory cell composition of BALF (C) were examined as described in Fig. 1. Representative results of six animals were shown. (D) Splenic CD4+ T cells (105/0.2 ml well–1) from BALB/c mice were cultured with medium alone or various combinations of IL-2 (200 pM) and IL-18 (50 ng ml–1). After 4 days of culture, supernatants were harvested and tested for IL-4 and IL-13 contents by ELISA. Results are geometric means + SD. (E) Wild-type mice were daily exposed intranasally to IL-18 (1 µg day–1) and IL-2 (500 U day–1) for 1–4 days. Lungs were removed at 8 h after the final exposure to IL-2 and IL-18, and homogenized and centrifuged as described in Methods. The obtained supernatants were tested for IL-4 and IL-13 contents by ELISA. Results are geometric means + SD.

 
Expression of mRNAs for cytokines and chemokines in lung of IL-2 plus IL-18-treated mice
To evaluate further which cytokines and/or chemokines regulate IL-2 plus IL-18-induced airway eosinophilic and neutrophilic inflammation, lungs were tested for the expression of mRNA for cytokines and chemokines at various time points after intranasal administration of IL-2 and IL-18. mRNAs for cytokines (IL-4, IL-5, IL-9, IL-13 and IL-17) and chemokines (MIP-2, GCP-2, eotaxin and eotaxin-2) were measured by RT–PCR. Normally these cytokines/chemokines mRNAs are below the detection level in the lungs of naive mice. However, mRNAs for IL-4, IL-5, IL-9 and IL-13 became detectable at day 1 and gradually increased in the lungs of both wild-type and STAT6–/– mice after intranasal administration of IL-2 and IL-18 (Fig. 4). IL-5 and IL-9 mRNAs were apparently expressed in STAT6–/– mice. Nevertheless, these mice did not develop AHR and eosinophilic airway inflammation (Fig. 3B and C), suggesting that these two cytokines are not involved in IL-2 plus IL-18-induced asthma. mRNAs for IL-17 and CXC chemokines (MIP-2 and GCP-2) also became detectable at day 1 and sustained their expressions until day 4 in both wild-type and STAT6–/– mice treated with intranasal administration of IL-2 and IL-18 (Fig. 4). MIP-2 and GCP-2 are potent chemoattractants for neutrophils (32,33). IL-17 is produced principally by CD4+ T cells and bears the potential to increase neutrophil recruitment into the airways by releasing several CXC chemokines, including GCP-2 and MIP-2 in bronchial epithelial cells (34,35). Thus, IL-2 and IL-18-induced airway neutrophilic infiltration even in STAT6–/– mice could be explained by the function of IL-17 and/or CXC chemokines (MIP-2 and GCP-2). Most striking difference in the pattern of expression of mRNAs between wild-type and STAT6–/– mice is the expression of eotaxin, which is the most potent chemoattractant for eosinophils (Fig. 4). Eotaxin mRNA expression became detectable at day 1 and are persistently high up to day 4. STAT6–/– mice failed to increase this message, suggesting that IL-2 and IL-18 induce this message by STAT6 activation (Fig. 4). In addition to eotaxin, we have measured mRNAs for eotaxin-2 and RANTES, which are also known to recruit eosinophils. Like eotaxin, eotaxin-2 mRNA expression was promptly and STAT6-dependently induced and its expression was persistently high up to day 4. However, mRNA for RANTES was constitutively and highly expressed in the lungs of naive mice and was not up-regulated by IL-2 plus IL-18 treatment (Fig. 4). These results explain why STAT6–/– mice treated with IL-2 plus IL-18 lacked airway eosinophilic infiltration, even though they express IL-5 mRNA expression in their lungs.


Figure 4
View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4 Expression of mRNAs for cytokine and chemokine in lung from IL-2 plus IL-18-inhalated mice. Wild-type and STAT6–/– mice were daily exposed intranasally to IL-18 (1 µg day–1) and IL-2 (500 U day–1) for 1–4 days. Lungs were removed at 4 h after the final exposure to IL-2 and IL-18 and total RNA was extracted. Expression of mRNAs for cytokine (IL-4, IL-5, IL-9, IL-13 and IL-17) and chemokine (MIP-2, GCP-2, eotaxin, eotaxin-2 and RANTES) were measured by RT-PCR.

 
We finally compared the activity of IL-4, IL-5 or IL-13 to induce eotaxin expression in cultured fibroblasts. As reported (36,37), IL-4 and IL-13 showed comparable effect on eotaxin induction from cultured fibroblasts but failed to exhibit additive inducing effect (IL-4, 605.9 ± 37.9 pg ml–1; IL-13, 467.7 ± 33.4 pg ml–1; IL-4 + IL-13, 599.5 ± 36.0 pg ml–1). In contrast, IL-5 could not induce this chemokine expression. These results substantiated further the observation that IL-2 and IL-18 induce eosinophilic infiltration in the lungs by dominant IL-13 induction with poor IL-4 in lung-infiltrating CD4+ T cells.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Patients with extrinsic bronchial asthma develop AHR when challenged with corresponding allergen. Thus, allergen acts as a causative factor in Th2 cell-mediated bronchial asthma. However, bronchial asthma patients often exhibit AHR following infection with bacteria or viruses (38). It is well-known evidence that infection with Mycoplasma pneumoniae or influenza A often induces asthma-like AHR even in the non-allergic patients (39–41). Therefore, it is very important to reveal the mechanism of how these infections exacerbates bronchial asthma independently of Ag. Since IL-18 is deeply associated with induction or exacerbation of bronchial asthma and is also markedly induced following several infections, in this report we tested the pathological effect of IL-18 on AHR and airway inflammation.

IL-18 is a unique cytokine that regulates both Th1 and Th2 responses (23). IL-18 and IL-12 act synergistically to promote IFN-{gamma} production (19,28,42). However, IL-18 with IL-2 shows the capacity to induce production of Th2 cytokines (IL-4, IL-5, IL-9 and IL-13) from CD4+ T cells (25,26). Thus, IL-18 induces Th1 or Th2 cytokines production from T cells dependently of its cytokine milieu. In general, Th1 or Th2 cells require TCR engagement to produce Th1- or Th2-related cytokines, respectively. As noted above, IL-18 plus IL-12- or IL-18 plus IL-2-stimulated T cells produce Th1- or Th2-related cytokines, respectively, without TCR engagement. Therefore, we previously proposed that there are two types of T cell activation pathway, acquired type (TCR-dependent) activation and innate type (TCR-independent) activation pathways (29). It is well accepted that acquired T cell activation pathway plays a critical role in an acquired immune response, particularly bronchial asthma. In contrast, it is still unclear whether the innate T cell activation pathway is indeed involved in the pathogenesis of bronchial asthma. Therefore, we sought to determine the pathological effect of IL-18-mediated innate T cell activation pathway for induction of bronchial asthma.

In this study, we have shown that daily intranasal administrations of IL-2 and IL-18 into naive mice for four consecutive days induce them to develop goblet cell metaplasia with mucus hypersecretion, airway eosinophilic as well as neutrophilic infiltration and AHR, which are prominent features of bronchial asthma (Figs. 1 and 2). Then, we tried to elucidate the underlying mechanism of how this treatment induces bronchial asthma. We found that IL-2 and IL-18 act on CD4+ T cells to produce IL-13, which in turn induces goblet cell metaplasia with mucus hypersecretion and eosinophilic infiltration in the lungs. Mucus hypersecretion is completely inhibited by IL-13-neutralization. Furthermore, IL-4–/– mice normally developed goblet cell metaplasia and eosinophilic infiltration in response to intranasal administration of IL-2 and IL-18. Thus, IL-2 and IL-18 induce goblet cell metaplasia and eosinophilic inflammation principally by IL-13 induction. Indeed and importantly, in vitro CD4+ T cell activation with IL-2 and IL-18 induces IL-13 production strongly and IL-4 production weakly (Fig. 3D). In contrast to the poor IL-4 induction by IL-2 and IL-18, this combination strongly induced IL-13 in the lungs (Fig. 3E). Thus, IL-2 and IL-18 mainly induced bronchial asthma via IL-13. However, IL-4–/– mice partially reduced AHR (Fig. 3B), suggesting that IL-2 plus IL-18-stimulated T cells partly induce AHR via IL-4.

In animal models of allergic asthma, blockage of IL-13 markedly inhibits allergen-induced AHR (11,12). IL-13–/– mice sensitized and challenged with antigen fail to develop AHR, although they develop severe airway inflammation (43). Furthermore, IL-13 delivery to the airway of naive mice causes AHR without antigen (11,12). All of these reports demonstrate the essential role of IL-13 in the development of AHR. However, other studies suggest that IL-4 by itself can induce AHR. Indeed, IL-4 delivery to the airway of naive Rag-2–/– mice causes AHR (12). Like IL-13, IL-4 affects epithelial cells and smooth muscle cells to induce AHR (44,45). Furthermore, in lung epithelial cells, both IL-4 and IL-13 inhibit the activity of inducible nitric oxide synthesis and decrease production of nitric oxide, a bronchodilator (46). Our data indicated the strong contribution of IL-13 to bronchial asthma. However, contribution of IL-4 to IL-2 plus IL-18-induced asthma seems to be very weak, perhaps due to the low ability of IL-2 plus IL-18-stimulated T cells to produce IL-4.

We also found that intranasal administration of IL-2 and IL-18 induces various mRNAs for cytokines (IL-4, IL-5, IL-9, IL-13 and IL-17) and chemokines (MIP-2 and GCP-2) in lungs of wild-type and STAT6–/– mice (Fig. 4). Wild-type mice developed eosinophilic infiltration, which was inhibited by neutralization of IL-13. STAT6–/– mice did not develop eosinophilic infiltration, even though they normally expressed mRNAs for IL-5 and RANTES, suggesting that STAT6 activation is responsible for inducing eosinophilic infiltration. Wild-type mice expressed eotaxin and eotaxin-2, while STAT6–/– mice did not (Fig. 4), suggesting that induction of eotaxin and eotaxin-2 is dependent upon STAT6 activation. IL-13 or IL-4 equally induced eotaxin in cultured fibroblasts. In contrast, IL-5 failed to induce this chemokine. Beside this, IL-4 or IL-13 can induce the endothelial expression of vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 (VCAM-1) (47), which binds to integrin {alpha}4ß1 (VLA-4) expressed on eosinophils (48). Thus, IL-13 induces eosinophilic infiltration by induction of eotaxin and VCAM-1 in a STAT6-dependent manner. IL-4 also has the same potential. Nevertheless, neutralization of IL-13 alone almost completely inhibited AHR, eosinophilic infiltration and mucus secretion (Fig. 3). Based on these evidences, we concluded that IL-2 and IL-18 induce eosinophilic infiltration by strong promotion of IL-13 induction from T cells.

IL-2 and IL-18 also induced neutrophilic infiltration. In contrast to airway eosinophilia, IL-2 plus IL-18-induced airway neutrophilia is not dependent on STAT6 (Fig. 3). It has been reported that IL-17 bears the potential to increase neutrophil recruitment into the airways by releasing several different CXC chemokines including GCP-2, Gro-{alpha} and IL-8 in human bronchial epithelial cells or MIP-2 in mouse bronchial epithelial cells, respectively (34,35). All of these CXC chemokines are potent neutrophil chemotactants (33). In this study, IL-2 plus IL-18-administered STAT6–/– mice showed airway neutrophilia (Fig. 3) and increased expression of mRNAs for IL-17, MIP-2 and GCP-2 (Fig. 4). Taken together, IL-2 plus IL-18 induced airway neutrophilia by induction of IL-17 and/or CXC chemokines (MIP-2 and GCP-2).

Recently, we have demonstrated that Th1 cells have the capacity to produce both Th1 cytokines and Th2 cytokines when stimulated with Ag and IL-18 and become very pathological cells when they show such phenotype in the lung (17). Mice transferred with Ag-specific Th1 cells exhibit neither AHR nor respiratory tract eosinophilic inflammation when challenged with intranasal administration of Ag. However, they suffer from severe bronchial asthma upon challenge with Ag plus IL-18, with comparable levels of AHR and eosinophilic inflammation to those in mice transferred with Th2 cells and challenged with Ag later (17). The former type of asthma is categorized as acquired type Th1 asthma to distinguish this from Th2-induced bronchial asthma. Consistent with previous reports, neutralization of IL-13 inhibits AHR and eosinophilic infiltration in Th2-induced bronchial asthma. In contrast, blockade of IL-13 does not reduce IL-18-induced Th1 asthma, although this treatment markedly reduces eosinophilic infiltration in the airway (17), suggesting that molecules other than IL-13 contribute to the development of Ag plus IL-18-induced AHR in Th1 mice.

In the present study, we have revealed that neutralization of IL-13 almost completely inhibited IL-2 plus IL-18-induced bronchial asthma (Fig. 3). However, it is important to know the effect of endogenous IFN-{gamma}. Thus, we administered IL-2 plus IL-18 into wild-type BALB/c and BALB/c-background IFN-{gamma}–/– mice. Both wild-type and IFN-{gamma}–/– BALB/c mice showed similar degree of mucus production in the lungs. Furthermore, they showed comparable level of AHR upon Mch challenge. However, IL-2 plus IL-18-adminstered IFN-{gamma}–/– mice exhibited ~1.5-fold increase in the number of eosinophils in their BALF (data not shown). These results taken together indicate that compared with strong IL-12 plus IL-18 effect on IFN-{gamma} production from T cells, IL-2 plus IL-18 poorly induced T cell IFN-{gamma} production, resulting in little effect on AHR, mucus production and eosinophilic infiltration. Thus, IL-2 plus IL-18 mainly induces AHR via IL-13 but not IFN-{gamma}. Importantly, intranasal administration of IL-2 plus IL-18 into mice induces bronchial asthma independently of antigenic challenge. Therefore, IL-18 is critically involved in the pathogenesis of both acquired type and innate type bronchial asthma, suggesting IL-18 as a therapeutic target for the treatment of both types of bronchial asthma.


    Acknowledgements
 
This study is supported by Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Priority Areas and Hitech Research Center grant from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan.


    Abbreviations
 
AHR, airway hyperresponsiveness
Mch, methacholine
BAL, bronchoalveolar lavage
BALF, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid
IL-13R{alpha}2-Fc, IL-13R{alpha}2-human Fc fusion protein

    Notes
 
Transmitting editor: T. Hamaoka

Received 13 January 2006, accepted 7 March 2006.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Bochner BS, Undem BJ, Lichtenstein LM. (1994) Immunological aspects of allergic asthma. Annu. Rev. Immunol 12:295.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  2. Busse WW and Lemanske RJ. (2001) Asthma. N. Engl. J. Med 344:350.[Free Full Text]
  3. Davies DE, Wicks J, Powell RM, Puddicombe SM, Holgate ST. (2003) Airway remodeling in asthma: new insights. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 111:215 quiz 226.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  4. Wills-Karp M. (1999) Immunologic basis of antigen-induced airway hyperresponsiveness. Annu. Rev. Immunol 17:255.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  5. Renauld JC. (2001) New insights into the role of cytokines in asthma. J. Clin. Pathol 54:577.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Umetsu DT, McIntire JJ, Akbari O, Macaubas C, DeKruyff RH. (2002) Asthma: an epidemic of dysregulated immunity. Nat. Immunol 3:715.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  7. Elias JA, Lee CG, Zheng T, Ma B, Homer RJ, Zhu Z. (2003) New insights into the pathogenesis of asthma. J. Clin. Invest 111:291.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  8. Krug N, Erpenbeck VJ, Balke K, et al. (2001) Cytokine profile of bronchoalveolar lavage-derived CD4(+), CD8(+), and {gamma}{delta} T cells in people with asthma after segmental allergen challenge. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol 25:125.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Robinson DS, Hamid Q, Ying S, et al. (1992) Predominant TH2-like bronchoalveolar T-lymphocyte population in atopic asthma. N. Engl. J. Med 326:298.[Abstract]
  10. Cohn L, Tepper JS, Bottomly K. (1998) IL-4-independent induction of airway hyperresponsiveness by Th2, but not Th1, cells. J. Immunol 161:3813.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Wills-Karp M, Luyimbazi J, Xu X, et al. (1998) Interleukin-13: central mediator of allergic asthma. Science 282:2258.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Grunig G, Warnock M, Wakil AE, et al. (1998) Requirement for IL-13 independently of IL-4 in experimental asthma. Science 282:2261.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Kuperman DA, Huang X, Koth LL, et al. (2002) Direct effects of interleukin-13 on epithelial cells cause airway hyperreactivity and mucus overproduction in asthma. Nat. Med 8:885.[Web of Science][Medline]
  14. Wills-Karp M. (2004) Interleukin-13 in asthma pathogenesis. Immunol. Rev 202:175.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  15. Del Prete A. (1998) The concept of type-1 and type-2 helper T cells and their cytokines in humans. Int. Rev. Immunol 16:427.[Medline]
  16. Huang TJ, MacAry PA, Eynott P, et al. (2001) Allergen-specific Th1 cells counteract efferent Th2 cell-dependent bronchial hyperresponsiveness and eosinophilic inflammation partly via IFN-{gamma}. J. Immunol 166:207.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Sugimoto T, Ishikawa Y, Yoshimoto T, Hayashi N, Fujimoto J, Nakanishi K. (2004) Interleukin 18 acts on memory T helper cells type 1 to induce airway inflammation and hyperresponsiveness in a naive host mouse. J. Exp. Med 199:535.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Ford JG, Rennick D, Donaldson DD, et al. (2001) IL-13 and IFN-{gamma}: interactions in lung inflammation. J. Immunol 167:1769.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Okamura H, Tsutsi H, Komatsu T, et al. (1995) Cloning of a new cytokine that induces IFN-{gamma} production by T cells. Nature 378:88.[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Kohno K, Kataoka J, Ohtsuki T, et al. (1997) IFN-{gamma}-inducing factor (IGIF) is a costimulatory factor on the activation of Th1 but not Th2 cells and exerts its effect independently of IL-12. J. Immunol 158:1541.[Abstract]
  21. Okamura H, Tsutsui H, Kashiwamura S, Yoshimoto T, Nakanishi K. (1998) Interleukin-18: a novel cytokine that augments both innate and acquired immunity. Adv. Immunol 70:281.[Web of Science][Medline]
  22. Hoshino T, Wiltrout RH, Young HA. (1999) IL-18 is a potent coinducer of IL-13 in NK and T cells: a new potential role for IL-18 in modulating the immune response. J. Immunol 162:5070.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Nakanishi K, Yoshimoto T, Tsutsui H, Okamura H. (2001) Interleukin-18 regulates both Th1 and Th2 responses. Annu. Rev. Immunol 19:423.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  24. Wild JS, Sigounas A, Sur N, et al. (2000) IFN-gamma-inducing factor (IL-18) increases allergic sensitization, serum IgE, Th2 cytokines, and airway eosinophilia in a mouse model of allergic asthma. J. Immunol 164:2701.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Yoshimoto T, Min B, Sugimoto T, et al. (2003) Nonredundant roles for CD1d-restricted natural killer T cells and conventional CD4+ T cells in the induction of immunoglobulin E antibodies in response to interleukin 18 treatment of mice. J. Exp. Med 197:997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Yoshimoto T, Mizutani H, Tsutsui H, et al. (2000) IL-18 induction of IgE: dependence on CD4+ T cells, IL-4 and STAT6. Nat. Immunol 1:132.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  27. Yoshimoto T, Tsutsui H, Tominaga K, et al. (1999) IL-18, although antiallergic when administered with IL-12, stimulates IL-4 and histamine release by basophils. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96:13962.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Yoshimoto T, Takeda K, Tanaka T, et al. (1998) IL-12 up-regulates IL-18 receptor expression on T cells, Th1 cells, and B cells: synergism with IL-18 for IFN-{gamma} production. J. Immunol 161:3400.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Nakanishi K. (2001) Innate and acquired activation pathways in T cells. Nat. Immunol 2:140.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  30. Yang J, Zhu H, Murphy TL, Ouyang W, Murphy KM. (2001) IL-18-stimulated GADD45 ß required in cytokine-induced, but not TCR-induced, IFN-{gamma} production. Nat. Immunol 2:157.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  31. Cameron LA, Taha RA, Tsicopoulos A, et al. (1999) Airway epithelium expresses interleukin-18. Eur. Respir. J 14:553.[Abstract]
  32. Driscoll KE, Hassenbein DG, Howard BW, et al. (1995) Cloning, expression, and functional characterization of rat MIP-2: a neutrophil chemoattractant and epithelial cell mitogen. J. Leukoc. Biol 58:359.[Abstract]
  33. Van Damme J, Wuyts A, Froyen G, et al. (1997) Granulocyte chemotactic protein-2 and related CXC chemokines: from gene regulation to receptor usage. J. Leukoc. Biol 62:563.[Abstract]
  34. Laan M, Cui ZH, Hoshino H, et al. (1999) Neutrophil recruitment by human IL-17 via C-X-C chemokine release in the airways. J. Immunol 162:2347.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Linden A. (2001) Role of interleukin-17 and the neutrophil in asthma. Int. Arch. Allergy Immunol 126:179.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  36. Fujisawa T, Kato Y, Atsuta J, et al. (2000) Chemokine production by the BEAS-2B human bronchial epithelial cells: differential regulation of eotaxin, IL-8, and RANTES by TH2- and TH1-derived cytokines. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol 105:126.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  37. Sato T, Saito R, Jinushi T, Tsuji T, et al. (2004) IFN-{gamma}-induced SOCS-1 regulates STAT6-dependent eotaxin production triggered by IL-4 and TNF-{alpha}. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun 314:468.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  38. Holt PG and Sly PD. (2002) Interactions between respiratory tract infections and atopy in the aetiology of asthma. Eur. Respir. J 19:538.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Wilsher ML and Kolbe J. (1995) Association of Mycoplasma pneumoniae antigen with initial onset of bronchial asthma. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med 151:579.[Web of Science][Medline]
  40. Kraft M, Cassell GH, Henson JE, et al. (1998) Detection of Mycoplasma pneumoniae in the airways of adults with chronic asthma. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med 158:998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Lemanske RF. (2004) Viral infections and asthma inception. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol 114:1023.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  42. Yoshimoto T, Okamura H, Tagawa Y-I, Iwakura Y, Nakanishi K. (1997) Interleukin 18 together with interleukin 12 inhibits IgE production by induction of interferon-gamma production from activated B cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94:3948.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Walter DM, McIntire JJ, Berry G, et al. (2001) Critical role for IL-13 in the development of allergen-induced airway hyperreactivity. J. Immunol 167:4668.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Hakonarson H, Maskeri N, Carter C, Grunstein MM. (1999) Regulation of TH1- and TH2-type cytokine expression and action in atopic asthmatic sensitized airway smooth muscle. J. Clin. Invest 103:1077.[Web of Science][Medline]
  45. Howarth PH, Knox AJ, Amrani Y, Tliba O, Panettieri RA Jr., Johnson M. (2004) Synthetic responses in airway smooth muscle. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 114:S32.[CrossRef][Medline]
  46. Berkman N, Robichaud A, Robbins RA, et al. (1996) Inhibition of inducible nitric oxide synthase expression by interleukin-4 and interleukin-13 in human lung epithelial cells. Immunology 89:363.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  47. Ying S, Meng Q, Barata LT, Robinson DS, Durham SR, Kay AB. (1997) Associations between IL-13 and IL-4 (mRNA and protein), vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 expression, and the infiltration of eosinophils, macrophages, and T cells in allergen-induced late-phase cutaneous reactions in atopic subjects. J. Immunol 158:5050.[Abstract]
  48. Yuan Q, Austen KF, Friend DS, Heidtman M, Boyce JA. (1997) Human peripheral blood eosinophils express a functional c-kit receptor for stem cell factor that stimulates very late antigen 4 (VLA-4)-mediated cell adhesion to fibronectin and vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 (VCAM-1). J. Exp. Med 186:313.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
F. D. Finkelman, S. P. Hogan, G. K. K. Hershey, M. E. Rothenberg, and M. Wills-Karp
Importance of Cytokines in Murine Allergic Airway Disease and Human Asthma
J. Immunol., February 15, 2010; 184(4): 1663 - 1674.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int ImmunolHome page
Z. Wiener, P. Pocza, M. Racz, G. Nagy, G. Tolgyesi, V. Molnar, J. Jaeger, E. Buzas, E. Gorbe, Z. Papp, et al.
IL-18 induces a marked gene expression profile change and increased Ccl1 (I-309) production in mouse mucosal mast cell homologs
Int. Immunol., December 1, 2008; 20(12): 1565 - 1573.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Leukoc. Biol.Home page
C. A. Hudson, G. P. Christophi, R. C. Gruber, J. R. Wilmore, D. A. Lawrence, and P. T. Massa
Induction of IL-33 expression and activity in central nervous system glia
J. Leukoc. Biol., September 1, 2008; 84(3): 631 - 643.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int ImmunolHome page
Y. Kondo, T. Yoshimoto, K. Yasuda, S. Futatsugi-Yumikura, M. Morimoto, N. Hayashi, T. Hoshino, J. Fujimoto, and K. Nakanishi
Administration of IL-33 induces airway hyperresponsiveness and goblet cell hyperplasia in the lungs in the absence of adaptive immune system
Int. Immunol., June 1, 2008; 20(6): 791 - 800.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
T. Yoshimoto, T. Yoshimoto, K. Yasuda, J. Mizuguchi, and K. Nakanishi
IL-27 Suppresses Th2 Cell Development and Th2 Cytokines Production from Polarized Th2 Cells: A Novel Therapeutic Way for Th2-Mediated Allergic Inflammation
J. Immunol., October 1, 2007; 179(7): 4415 - 4423.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
N. Hayashi, T. Yoshimoto, K. Izuhara, K. Matsui, T. Tanaka, and K. Nakanishi
T helper 1 cells stimulated with ovalbumin and IL-18 induce airway hyperresponsiveness and lung fibrosis by IFN-{gamma} and IL-13 production
PNAS, September 11, 2007; 104(37): 14765 - 14770.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
18/6/847    most recent
dxl021v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ishikawa, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Nakanishi, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ishikawa, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Nakanishi, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?