Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wu, S.
Right arrow Articles by Gorski, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wu, S.
Right arrow Articles by Gorski, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

International Immunology, Vol 9, 1495-1502, Copyright © 1997 by Oxford University Press


ARTICLES

Polymorphism at beta 85 and not beta 86 of HLA-DR1 is predominantly responsible for restricting the nature of the anchor side chain: implication for concerted effects of class II MHC polymorphism

S Wu and J Gorski
Immunogenetics Research, Blood Research Institute, Blood Center of Southeastern Wisconsin, Milwaukee 53233, USA.

The first hydrophobic pocket, P1, of class II MHC has been shown to be an important site of peptide anchoring. Two polymorphisms occur in this pocket in the human class II MHC beta chain at position 85 and 86. beta 85 is usually Val, occasionally Ala, whereas beta 86 can be Gly or Val. However, Ala85 is found only in conjunction with Val86. The independent effect of the polymorphism at these two positions on the binding of normal and substituted antigenic peptides has never been examined. To do so, three soluble HLA-DR1 variants that contain the naturally occurring combinations of these side chains at these two positions were generated and tested with a panel of influenza matrix peptides varying at anchor P1. DR1 alleles differing only at position 86 are very similar in the binding of a panel of antigenic peptide, indicating that beta 86 does not substantially influence the peptide binding of DR1. In contrast, DR1 varying only at position beta 85 differ in their binding of substituted peptides containing Ala, Tyr or Trp at the P1 anchor position. Thus, beta 85 shows the predominant effect on the P1 anchor side chain preference of the P1 pocket in DR1. This is in contrast to other HLA-DR alleles where beta 86 has been shown to control the nature of the P1 anchor. These previous data together with our own imply that the role of polymorphism in P1 may be influenced by the contextual framework of the remaining allelic polymorphism.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
A. Ferrante and J. Gorski
Cooperativity of Hydrophobic Anchor Interactions: Evidence for Epitope Selection by MHC Class II as a Folding Process
J. Immunol., June 1, 2007; 178(11): 7181 - 7189.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int ImmunolHome page
G. Diaz, M. Amicosante, D. Jaraquemada, R. H. Butler, M. V. Guillen, M. Sanchez, C. Nombela, and J. Arroyo
Functional analysis of HLA-DP polymorphism: a crucial role for DP{beta} residues 9, 11, 35, 55, 56, 69 and 84-87 in T cell allorecognition and peptide binding
Int. Immunol., May 1, 2003; 15(5): 565 - 576.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.