Skip Navigation


International Immunology Advance Access originally published online on November 15, 2005
International Immunology 2006 18(1):89-100; doi:10.1093/intimm/dxh352
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
18/1/89    most recent
dxh352v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bruder, D.
Right arrow Articles by Weiss, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bruder, D.
Right arrow Articles by Weiss, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© The Japanese Society for Immunology. 2005. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Multiple synergizing factors contribute to the strength of the CD8+ T cell response against listeriolysin O

Dunja Bruder1, Alexander K. Nussbaum2, Dimitry M. Gakamsky3, Markus Schirle2, Stefan Stevanovic2, Harpreet Singh-Jasuja2, Ayub Darji4, Trinad Chakraborty4, Hansjörg Schild2,5, Israel Pecht3 and Siegfried Weiss1

1 Molecular Immunology, Department of Cell Biology and Immunology, German Research Centre for Biotechnology, Mascheroder Weg 1, D-38124 Braunschweig, Germany
2 Department of Immunology, Institute for Cell Biology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
3 Department of Immunology, Weizmann Institute for Science, Rehovot, Israel
4 Institute for Medical Microbiology, University of Giessen, Giessen, Germany
5 Institute for Immunology, University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany

Correspondence to: D. Bruder; E-mail: dbr{at}gbf.de

Immunodominance in CD8+ T cell responses against Listeria monocytogenes is a well-recognized but still not fully understood phenomenon. From listeriolysin, the major virulence factor of L. monocytogenes, only a single epitope, pLLO91-99, is presented by MHC class I molecules in BALB/c mice which dominates the cytotoxic T cell response against this bacterial pathogen. To obtain more insights into the molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying immunodominance of this particular epitope, we compared the various steps involved in the presentation and recognition of pLLO91-99 derived from a wild-type toxin with an equivalent epitope from a mutated toxin. This fully functional variant contains within the pLLO91-99 epitope a conservative isoleucine to alanine replacement at the C-terminal anchor residue which results in loss of antigenicity. The binding properties of the variant peptide to soluble Kd remained unaffected and cytotoxic T cells capable of recognizing the pLLO99A/Kd complex were detectable in BALB/c mice. However, such T cells required higher concentrations of antigen in order to be optimally activated in vitro. A comparison between the TAP translocation efficiency of wild-type and mutant peptide demonstrated that the mutation at the C-terminus leads to a reduced transportation rate. Furthermore, the amino acid substitution changes the in vitro proteasomal cleavage pattern, resulting in a reduced liberation of the correct peptide from a polypeptide precursor. Thus, in all assays employed the immunodominant epitope performs optimally while the variant was found to be inferior. The synergy of all these steps most likely is the decisive factor in the immunodominance of pLLO91-99.

Keywords: antigen presentation/processing, cytotoxic T cells, epitopes, MHC class I

Transmitting editor: A. Radbruch


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.