Skip Navigation


International Immunology Advance Access originally published online on November 22, 2005
International Immunology 2005 17(12):1631-1637; doi:10.1093/intimm/dxh343
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
17/12/1631    most recent
dxh343v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lakos, A.
Right arrow Articles by Granström, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lakos, A.
Right arrow Articles by Granström, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© The Japanese Society for Immunology. 2005. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Different B-cell populations are responsible for the peripheral and intrathecal antibody production in neuroborreliosis

András Lakos1, Emoke Ferenczi2, Sámuel Komoly3,4 and Marta Granström5

1 Center for Tick-borne Diseases, Visegrádi 14, H-1132 Budapest, Hungary
2 Department of Virology, Johan Béla National Center for Epidemiology, Gyáli u 2-6, H-1096 Budapest, Hungary
3 National Center for Neuroimmunology, Jahn Ferenc Teaching Hospital, Köves u. 2-4, H-1204 Budapest, Hungary
4 Department of Neurology, University of Pécs, Rét u. 2, 7623 Pécs, Hungary
5 Department of Clinical Microbiology, Microbiology and Tumorbiology Center (MTC), Karolinska Hospital, SE-171 76 Stockholm, Sweden

Correspondence to: A. Lakos; E-mail: alakos{at}axelero.hu

The diagnosis of neuroborreliosis (NB)—a serious complication of Lyme disease—relies on demonstration of intrathecal borrelia antibody production. We hypothesized that if a qualitative difference between the cerebrospinal fluid and the serum immunoblot-banding patterns was observed, then the borrelia antibodies found in the CSF could not be the result of leakage of serum antibodies to the CSF due to blood–brain barrier damage, but rather had to be produced intrathecally. CSF/serum pairs from 69 NB patients and from 85 control patients with other neurological disorders were investigated. All samples were tested blindly by immunoblot and a commercial capture ELISA kit for NB. The concordance between the two methods was 85.7%. When using the other method as reference, the accuracy of the two assays in the two patient materials was similar: 80% for sensitivity and 95% for specificity. Four types of comparative immunoblot-banding patterns that reflected intrathecal borrelia antibody synthesis were distinguished. The study showed that a simple comparison between the immunoblot pattern of serum and CSF samples allows for a reliable diagnosis of NB by demonstration of intrathecal antibody production. This is the first study to show that a qualitative difference of the antibody response between the immune response of serum and CSF is a rule. The findings also imply that partly different B-cell populations are responsible for the antibody production in the blood and in the central nervous system. In addition, our observation provides possible implications for other infectious diseases with CNS involvement.

Keywords: Borrelia burgdorferi, comparative immunoblot assay, intrathecal antibody synthesis, Lyme disease, neuroborreliosis

Transmitting editor: A. Falus


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.