International Immunology, Vol. 15, No. 7, pp. 781-787,
July 2003
© 2003 Japanese Society for Immunology
Predicting proteasomal cleavage sites: a comparison of available methods
mir1,4
1 Center for Biological Sequence Analysis, BioCentrum-DTU, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark 2 Institute of Biology and Ecology, P. J.
afárik University, Kosice, Slovakia 3 Institute for Medical Microbiology and Immunology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark 4 Theoretical Biology/Bioinformatics, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
Correspondence to: C. Ke
mir, Theoretical Biology/Bioinformatics, Utrecht University, Padualaan 8, 3584 CH Utrecht, The Netherlands. E-mail: C.Kesmir{at}bio.uu.nl
Transmitting editor: M. J. Bevan
The proteasome plays an essential role in the immune responses of vertebrates. By degrading intercellular proteins from self and non-self, the proteasome produces the majority of the peptides that are presented to cytotoxic T cells (CTL). There is accumulating evidence that the C-terminal, in particular, of CTL epitopes is cleaved precisely by the proteasome, whereas the N-terminal is produced with an extension, and later trimmed by peptidases in the cytoplasm and in the endoplasmic reticulum. Recently, three publicly available methods have been developed for prediction of the specificity of the proteasome. Here, we compare the performance of these methods on a large set of CTL epitopes. The best method, NetChop at www.cbs.dtu.dk/Services/NetChop, can capture
70% of the C-termini correctly. This result suggests that the predictions can still be improved, particularly if more quantitative degradation data become available.
Keywords: artificial neural network, cleavage site prediction, MHC class I epitope, proteasome, protein degradation
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
I. Ginodi, T. Vider-Shalit, L. Tsaban, and Y. Louzoun Precise score for the prediction of peptides cleaved by the proteasome Bioinformatics, February 15, 2008; 24(4): 477 - 483. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Lundegaard, O. Lund, C. Kesmir, S. Brunak, and M. Nielsen Modeling the adaptive immune system: predictions and simulations Bioinformatics, December 15, 2007; 23(24): 3265 - 3275. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Donnes and O. Kohlbacher Integrated modeling of the major events in the MHC class I antigen processing pathway Protein Sci., August 1, 2005; 14(8): 2132 - 2140. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Bhasin and G. P. S. Raghava Pcleavage: an SVM based method for prediction of constitutive proteasome and immunoproteasome cleavage sites in antigenic sequences Nucleic Acids Res., July 1, 2005; 33(suppl_2): W202 - W207. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Bredenbeck, F. O. Losch, T. Sharav, M. Eichler-Mertens, M. Filter, A. Givehchi, W. Sterry, P. Wrede, and P. Walden Identification of Noncanonical Melanoma-Associated T Cell Epitopes for Cancer Immunotherapy J. Immunol., June 1, 2005; 174(11): 6716 - 6724. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. H. Andersen, J. Fensterle, S. Ugurel, S. Reker, R. Houben, P. Guldberg, T. G. Berger, D. Schadendorf, U. Trefzer, E.-B. Brocker, et al. Immunogenicity of Constitutively Active V599EBRaf Cancer Res., August 1, 2004; 64(15): 5456 - 5460. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||




