Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Takumi, K.
Right arrow Articles by Havelaar, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Takumi, K.
Right arrow Articles by Havelaar, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

International Immunology, Vol. 14, No. 2, 111-119, February 2002
© 2002 Japanese Society for Immunology

A quantitative model for neutrophil response and delayed-type hypersensitivity reaction in rats orally inoculated with various doses of Salmonella Enteritidis

Katsuhisa Takumi, Johan Garssen1 and Arie Havelaar

Microbiological Laboratory for Health Protection, and
1 Laboratory for Pathology and Immunobiology, National Institute of Public Health and the Environment, PO Box 1, 3720 BA Bilthoven, The Netherlands

Correspondence to: K. Takumi; E-mail: katsuhisa.Takumi{at}rivm.nl

Our aim was to investigate the quantitative relationship between inoculation doses and physiological responses to infection by Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis. Rats were orally inoculated with 10–109 c.f.u. of S. Enteritidis and monitored for 6 days. Neutrophil and delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) responses were assessed, and the spleens were analyzed for the pathogen. The experimental data were analyzed by a mathematical model for the host response to salmonella infection, which is based on the assumptions that: (i) the number of pathogens in the inoculum is Poisson distributed, (ii) any cell that is inoculated can multiply and form a clone to infect the animal, (iii) the probability of infection by any cell of the pathogen is independent of the number of cells ingested, and (iv) the magnitude of the immune response increases with dose, but eventually saturates to a maximum level. The probability of infection assessed by the DTH response is 7.5 x 10–3/c.f.u. of the inoculum (confidence interval 5.1 x 10–5, 1.2 x 10–2). When five S. Enteritidis independently initiated the infection, the DTH response to the resulting clones of the salmonellae saturated to the maximum level. The probability of infection assessed by the neutrophil response is 3.4 x 10–4/c.f.u. (1.0 x 10–4, 6.8 x 10–4). The response saturated when six S. Enteritidis independently initiated the infection. The probability of infection assessed by the analysis of spleens is 1.2 x 10–3/c.f.u. (4.1 x 10–4, 2.6 x 10–3). We conclude that at low inocula, infections are initiated by very small numbers of bacteria. The magnitude of the immune responses is similar whether only a few or a larger number of bacteria initiated the infection.

Keywords: bacteria, dose, response, infectious immunity, in vivo animal models, mathematical model


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Infect. Immun.Home page
V. Konjufca, S.-Y. Wanda, M. C. Jenkins, and R. Curtiss III
A Recombinant Attenuated Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium Vaccine Encoding Eimeria acervulina Antigen Offers Protection against E. acervulina Challenge
Infect. Immun., December 1, 2006; 74(12): 6785 - 6796.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int ImmunolHome page
K. Takumi, J. Garssen, R. de Jonge, W. de Jong, and A. Havelaar
Release kinetics and cell trafficking in relation to bacterial growth explain the time course of blood neutrophils and monocytes during primary Salmonella infection
Int. Immunol., January 1, 2005; 17(1): 85 - 93.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.