Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation

International Immunology, Vol. 11, No. 10, 1717-1724, October 1999
© 1999 Japanese Society for Immunology


Corrected Article

Suppressive versus stimulatory effects of allergen/cholera toxoid (CTB) conjugates depending on the nature of the allergen in a murine model of type I allergy

Ursula Wiedermann1, Beatrice Jahn-Schmid1,2, Marianne Lindblad3, Carola Rask3, Jan Holmgren3, Dietrich Kraft1 and Christof Ebner1

1 Division of Immunopathology, Institute of General and Experimental Pathology, University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18–20, 1090 Vienna, Austria
2 Centre of Ultrastructural Research, University of Agriculture, Vienna, Austria,
3 Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Göteborg, Göteborg, Sweden

Correspondence to: U. Wiedermann

Abstract

Recent reports have demonstrated that feeding small amounts of antigen conjugated to the B subunit of cholera toxin (CTB) suppress immune responses in experimental models of certain Th1-based autoimmune diseases. We have established a model of aerosol sensitization leading to Th2-mediated allergic immune responses in BALB/c mice. In the present study two different antigens, the dietary antigen ovalbumin (OVA) and the inhalant allergen Bet v 1 (the major birch pollen allergen), chemically coupled to recombinant CTB were tested for their potential to influence Th2-like immune responses. Intranasal administration of OVA–CTB prior to sensitization with OVA led to a significant decrease of antigen-specific IgE antibody levels, but a marked increase of OVA-specific IgG2a antibodies as compared to non-pretreated, sensitized animals. Antigen-specific lympho-proliferative responses in vitro were reduced by 65% in the pretreated group; IL-5 and IL-4 production were decreased in responder cells of lungs and spleens of nasally pretreated mice. In contrast, mucosal administration of rBet v 1–CTB conjugates prior to sensitization led to an up-regulation of allergen-specific IgE, IgG1 and IgG2a, increased in vitro lympho-proliferative responses as well as augmented production of IL-5, IL-4, IL-10 and IFN-{gamma}. Intranasal administration prior to sensitization of unconjugated allergens showed also contrasting effects: OVA could not significantly influence antigen-specific antibody or cytokine production, whereas intranasal pretreatment with unconjugated Bet v 1 suppressed allergen-specific immune responses in vivo and in vitro. These results demonstrated that the two antigens—in conjugated as in unconjugated form—had different effects on the Th2 immune responses. We therefore conclude that the tolerogenic or immunogenic properties of CTB—and probably also other antigen-delivery systems—strongly depend on the nature of the coupled antigen–allergen.

Keywords: aerosol, BALB/c, cholera B subunit, intranasal, immunomodulation, Th2 response

Notes

Transmitting editor: A. Radbruch




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Infect. Immun.Home page
K. Eriksson, M. Fredriksson, I. Nordstrom, and J. Holmgren
Cholera Toxin and Its B Subunit Promote Dendritic Cell Vaccination with Different Influences on Th1 and Th2 Development
Infect. Immun., April 1, 2003; 71(4): 1740 - 1747.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Infect. Immun.Home page
A. George-Chandy, K. Eriksson, M. Lebens, I. Nordstrom, E. Schon, and J. Holmgren
Cholera Toxin B Subunit as a Carrier Molecule Promotes Antigen Presentation and Increases CD40 and CD86 Expression on Antigen-Presenting Cells
Infect. Immun., September 1, 2001; 69(9): 5716 - 5725.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.